古事記傅

(Kojiki-Den)






Kojiki-Den [古事記傅] volume 1, Explanation by Itwse (006)




(上件の趣春べ天詳尓ハ知べき那ら禰ど毛序の詞と可の二の史撰者”連し跡とを考へ合せ天加くも有个むと思者るる春ぢを一王多里いへ累那里)
(I can not clearly discovered the above. By the way, I said a guessable hypothesis, besed on the both meanings of the introduction of Kojiki and the tracks that two records was edited.)

又問彼川嶋皇子等に仰せし撰の事は書紀尓見え和銅七年乃と書記との事毛續紀尓載ら連多る尓此古事記を撰バし免給飛し古とは見えぬを思へ者”此記盤彼史ど毛能如き嚴重き公事尓ハ阿ら天”ただ内々能小事と見え又書紀尓神代巻など尓一書と天舉ら連多る可”數阿る中尓此記を取連多りとお本”し起毛阿連ば此記盤そ能可み如是累記録ど毛多尓有遣む中能一書と見え多里佐天書記盤その記録ど毛皆撰飛”取連天此毛彼毛集め天足者ぬ古登なく備連連ばさら尓此記の比尓あら須”此記盤い可天”可其と等那み尓尚飛”用婦べ可らむ
Moreover, he ask me, “The thing of the editing Kawashima-No-Miko was orderd is recorded on Syoki, and the things about the editing in 714 (Wado 7) and Syoki are recorded on Shokki, but we’re not able to find the record about the editing Kojiki. When considering the above, I say that the record isn’t a important public matter, but I think of the record as a personal small matter. it seems in which the Jindaiki and other of Syoki take it as one of references, so it seemed, in that time, the such one amoung a lot of records (they don’t have large value). In contrast, Syoki contains all the valuable records and gather from many records, therefore, it has no lack, then it is inconparable with Kojiki. Why you can regared this record as important as that record?”

答此記盤可能一書ど毛能中の一尓し天み奈書紀尓えらび取連天可連は事備連りと乃論ハ謂連多里
I answered.
Indeed, there are a such opinions which judge Kojiki as one of records referred by Syoki, and Syoki entirely refer the record, therefore Syoki has very enough contents.

誠尓書紀ハ事越記さるる古登廣く者多其年月日奈どま天”詳尓天不足こと那き史奈連ば此記の及バざ累古と毛多ハ云毛佐ら那里
In fact, because Syoki has taken many matters from various traditions, and even has been written the date of those matters, so the record has no lack, therefore, it is able to agree, and needless to say, that Kojiki has not some parts Syoki having.

然盤阿連ど毛又此記の優連る事をい者むに盤先神代尓書籍と云物那くし天ただ人の口尓言傳へ多らむ事ハ必書紀の文乃如く尓は非春”天此記の詞の如くにぞ有けむ
However, if I say that the point of Kojiki is being superior to Syoki, I say, “because there was not a text, in ancient times, and there had been only the handing down with oral, hence it would certainly not be like the words of Syoki, but like the words of Kojiki.






2017.3.8 五瀬(Itwse)





『古を思う』 トップページへ




inserted by FC2 system