古事記傅

(Kojiki-Den)






Kojiki-Den [古事記傅] volume 1, Explanation by Itwse (005)



さ連ば書記を撰者”礼しは此記の誤ある可”故尓ハ阿ら須”
Given the case, the reason why Syoki was edited is not if Kojiki had an error.

も登よ里其趣古と那る毛の那里
From the first, it has the meanings deferent to each other.

もし誤阿里とし天改め撰者”連む尓は是毛可能二乃史乃如く楚の可み者やく廢流べき尓此記のミは今世ま天”毛傳ハ連るを思ふべし
Suppose it has had an error, and it still wasn’t reduced, then that must be immediately forgotten just like as the two records, however, only the record has been known up to the present time. You should think of the fact.

又或人後世ま天”傳ハ累盤傳者らざるとはおの川”加ら能古とに古楚阿ら免加那ら須”冝 き尓よ里天傳者里冝可ら佐”累によ里天傳ハらざ累尓毛阿ら佐”る遍”し凡天漢尓毛此間尓毛古能書のいとよろし起も絶え佐も阿らぬ毛廣傳ハ連る多ぐひ多き尓阿ら春”やと疑婦
By the way, there was a happen that a person suspected, “whethr it has been handed down for the later eras or not, are decided accidentally. Because it is not correct that good one were handed down, and not good one were not handed down, commonly, in China and Our states, such the case are lot which the very good old works are forgotten, and not very good works are handed down. Is this untrue?”

答気らく大可多はさ流古と那連ど毛こ連は奈本然らじ
I answered, “in many case it is true, but even so, in this case it isn’t so.”

先彼二乃史ハ書紀續紀尓毛其事を記春るる保ど尓天公能書那連ば毛しおのづ可らに絶多らむ尓者志可春可”尓志バらくは世間尓毛のこり天人毛志里後代尓毛其名者”可り多”尓毛遺るべき尓佐ら尓そ乃名を多”尓志ら須”
First, those two were official records because Syoki and Shokki have recorded the things about the two, therefore, if the two were accidentally forgotten, it must not forget quickly, and many people recognized two around that time, at least, those titles should be handed down. However, persons does not know even the titles of two.

既く平城の代尓春ら知人毛那可りし尓や万葉集尓古能事越證免多る註奈ど尓毛引多るを見春”
In the period of Nara (710-784), already no one knew the records, but we couldn’t find that were refered with an annotation describing old matters in Manyousyuu and other works.

然るに此記盤潤色那くただ阿里に記し天漢の國史奈登”の體とハい多く異奈る物奈れ者”もし誤多加らむ尓はさしも漢籍好ましし世尓者やく癈ら連天と里見流人も有るまじくまし天後代ま天”ハ傳ハるまじ起物奈流尓千年の後まで毛傳者り来つるを思へばそのかみ書記い天”き亭毛奈本志可春可”尓公尓毛用飛ら連世人毛讀つとハ見え天可の万葉那ど尓毛往々に引出个る毛のをや
Nevertheless, Kojiki doesn’t like the national records of China, which having no embellishment and just recorded the pure traditions, therefore, if it had a lot of errors, it would be immediately forgotten, wouldn’t be to attract some persons and wouldn’t be handed down, because thus the people preferring Chinese books are many in that time. However, it does be handed down from the time for thousand years later, then I think that though Syoki have been edited, but even it would be used in public, civilians would also read it, and it be referred on Manyoushiu.







2017.2.27 五瀬(Itwse)





『古を思う』 トップページへ




inserted by FC2 system